Conference
Proposals

Call for Participation

Round 2: Call for Papers, Workshops & Alternative Format Submissions - Open until 31st October 2025!

Submissions for Round 2 is open! We welcome proposals for individual papers, workshops, and alternative presentation formats. 

  • Submissions open: 1st September 2025 

  • Submission deadline: 31st October 2025 (23:59 UTC) 

  • Notification of acceptance: 1st – 5th December 2025 

  • Confirmation & Registration Deadline: 19 December 2025 
    (You must respond to your acceptance email and purchase your ticket by this date to confirm your place in the programme.) 

Stay Connected 

We’ll share all important dates and updates through the Tech Abuse Updates. Please sign up here to stay informed and receive the latest announcements. 

For questions, contact us at genderandtech@ucl.ac.uk 

  • Deadline for completing Round 2 is 31 October 2025 (23:59 UTC) 

    All applicants must use the official Submission Form, and include: 

    •  An abstract title (max 300 characters) 

    •  An abstract (max 1300 characters)  

    For workshops or alternative formats: 
    Use the same form and include a title and a description of your proposed format. 

    Multiple submissions from an individual or group are welcome. However, to maintain a diverse and balanced programme, each accepted submission must have one registered presenter

    By submitting an abstract, you agree that, if accepted, at least one author will register and attend the full conference. 

    • Round 1 Authors: Must confirm and register before 1 September 2025 

    • Round 2 Authors: Must confirm and register by 19 December 2025 

  • Abstract length is up to 1300 characters with a working title of up to 300 characters. 

    An abstract is a window into your work. In 1300 characters or less your abstract should provide abstract reviewers with a clear and concise summary of what you will present on at the conference. Try to make your abstract enticing, using plain language. Succinctly outline why the study is important, how you did your study, how your programme was evaluated, your findings, why the reviewer should care about your work, and how it is important for the field. 

    It is the only information a reviewer will have about your work so it must provide enough information to stand on its own. 

  • Abstract submitters can submit abstracts on one of the following: 

    • Research 

    • Programmes and practice-based knowledge 

    • See tips on how to write a good conference abstract here

  • Reviewers will look at the following when reviewing your abstract: 

    • Relevance: Does it address a key theme or area of debate? Will it be of interest? 

    • Clarity/purpose: Are the objectives clear and well presented? 

    • Methods: Is the data analysis and interpretation appropriate? Is the methodology used appropriately 

    • Significance: Are the study/programme/policy findings significant? Are the conclusions clear and appropriate? 

    • Contribution: Does it provide recommendations for future projects/policy making? 

  • Accepted submissions will be organised into tracks for the conference. The list of relevant topics for submissions are, but are not limited to the following:

    • Cyber Aggression

    • Cyber Dating Abuse

    • Cyber Harassment

    • Cyber Violence

    • Cyberstalking

    • Deepfakes

    • Doxxing

    • Emerging-Tech-Enabled Abuse (e.g., Artificial Intelligence, Extended Reality/Metaverse etc.)

    • Image-Based [Sexual] Abuse (“Revenge Porn”, Non-Consensual Intimate Images, Dick Picks, Upskirting etc.)

    • Internet of Things (IoT)-Enabled Abuse

    • Interpersonal Electronic Surveillance

    • Online Harms

    • Online Misogyny

    • Online Safety

    • Online Victimisation

    • Online Violence Against Women

    • Sexting

    • Spyware/Parental Control Software/Spouseware/Stalkerware

    • Tech Abuse

    • Technology-Assisted Coercion and Control

    • Technology-Enabled Domestic Abuse

    • Technology-Facilitated Gender-Based Violence (TFGBV)

    • Technology-Mediated Intimate Partner Violence

  • All abstracts, workshops and alternative format proposals must be submitted using the submission form. Submissions will be editable until the deadline. If you require changes after this time, please write to us at genderandtech@ucl.ac.uk. All submissions must be in English.

FAQs

  • An abstract is short but powerful statement that succinctly describes a research project, policy or programme. It should contain the scope, purpose, results and contents of the work, and is an original summary of the larger report. It provides reviewers with enough information to evaluate quality, interest and innovation i.e. why is the research important; what problem does it address; methods used; results and implications for the field and key words. Please see the above page for further details.

  • Abstract submissions for Round 2 will open on 1st September 2025 and will close on 31 October 2025 (23:59 UTC). Please see the above page for more information.

  • After completing the submission form, applicants will have the option to save or print a PDF of their submission with their filled-in answers on the “Thank You” page. We will then contact all Round 2 applicants to let them know the outcome of their submission between 1 - 5 December 2025. Should you have any concerns, please contact us on: genderandtech@ucl.ac.uk

  • If the study is in the beginning phase you are advised not to submit, however, if your study is currently ongoing and you only have preliminary data, but it seems relevant or significant, please submit the abstract.

  • Please see the above page for more information. Round 2 of abstract submissions will open 1 September and will close 31 October 2025 (23:59 UTC).

  • You will be able to modify your abstract before the abstract submission deadline. No modifications will be possible after the submission deadline. If you need to make any modifications after the deadline 31 October 2025, please contact us at genderandtech@ucl.ac.uk

  • All submissions will be anonymously reviewed by the abstract review committee. Each abstract is submitted for peer review by members of the abstract review committee. Each abstract is adjudicated by at least two members of the committee.

  • If your abstract was rejected in Round 1, please only resubmit if it has been thoroughly revised or improved.

  • We are unable to provide feedback on rejected abstracts.

Subscribe

Sign up to our monthly newsletter to receive news and updates.

We respect your privacy.